Weil Restructuring

Ukraine’s Sovereign Restructuring: Why is this sovereign deal ground-breaking?

As settlement in relation to Ukraine’s successful sovereign exchange offers is expected today, we explain why this sovereign deal is groundbreaking.

 
Background: The Exchange Offers
On 22 September 2015, Ukraine launched Exchange Offers in relation to the following (Old Notes):


In exchange for each $1,000 of Old Notes, creditors will receive:

Upside Instruments: The GDP-linked Securities
The terms of the exchange provide creditors with a mechanism whereby they can potentially recover not only the amount of the haircut, but share in the economic recovery of Ukraine if certain GDP targets are met.
Through the GDP-linked Securities creditors are entitled to payments (beginning in 2021 annually, through to 2040) depending on Ukraine’s growth. Payments are triggered if annual growth:

Payments are capped at 1% of GDP from 2021 to 2025 and no GDP payments:

What distinguishes these GDP-linked Securities from others is the following:

According to Deutsche Bank Market Research these creditor protections “enhance the value of the [GDP-linked Securities], as they put in some specific creditor protection mechanisms that were absent (or more ambiguous) in some comparable securities, such as the Argentina GDP warrants.” In particular, the put option, which enables holders of the GDP-linked Securities to claim par in certain circumstances, “is a pure innovation in design of the Ukraine [GDP-linked Securities].”
New provisions for holdouts
The exchange offers were designed to encourage participation and to prevent the form of hold-out strategy pursued by certain funds in Argentina. This included:

Protections against holdouts going forward: Collective Action Clauses (or CACs)
Old Notes (Per Series): Old Notes contained per series CACs. In each series, if 75% in value voted in favour of the respective exchange offer, all holders in that series would be exchanged whether or not they voted in favour or against.
New Notes (Cross Series): New Notes contain the International Capital Market Association’s (ICMA) recommended CACs. This allows a super-majority across all series of New Notes to agree changes to bond terms that are then binding on all holders. Going forward this allows Ukraine to effectively treat all New Notes as a single group, removing the threat posed by holdouts.
For a further discussion of the new ICMA standard CACs, please see “Recent developments in sovereign debt restructuring: a step in the right direction?” by Kirsten Erichsen and Andrew J. Wilkinson dated 12 February 2015 http://eurorestructuring.weil.com/sovereign-debt/  recent-developments-in-sovereign-debt-restructuring-a-step-in-the-right-direction/
 

©2015. All rights reserved. Quotation with attribution is permitted. This publication provides general information and should not be used or taken as legal advice for specific situations which depend on the evaluation of precise factual circumstances. The views expressed in these articles reflect those of the authors and not necessarily the views of Weil, Gotshal & Manges.
Footnotes:
  1. Deutsch Bank Market Research Analyst Reports: (i) “Ukraine – Pricing the GDP Warrants” dated 16 September 2015; and (ii) “Ukraine: Pricing GDP Warrants, Part II – Discounting the Cash Flows” dated 9 October 2015
  2. Deutsch Bank Market Research Analyst Reports: (i) “Ukraine – Pricing the GDP Warrants” dated 16 September 2015; and (ii) “Ukraine: Pricing GDP Warrants, Part II – Discounting the Cash Flows” dated 9 October 2015
Exit mobile version